Comparison of standard mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability tests in a large cancer series.

BACKGROUND: The tumor-agnostic indication of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat cancers with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) increased the demand for such tests beyond Lynch syndrome. International guideline recommendations accept immunohistochemistry (IHC) for dMMR or molecular techniques (PCR or NGS) for MSI status determinations considering the two tests are equal, although there are scattered reports contradicting to this presumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we have directly compared four protein MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) to MSI Pentaplex PCR test in a large cancer patient cohort (n = 1306) of our diagnostic center where the two tests have been run parallel in 703 cases. RESULTS: In this study we have found a high discrepancy rate (19.3%) of the two tests which was independent of the tumor types. The MSI PCR sensitivity for MMR IHC status was found to be very low resulting in a relatively low positive and negative predicting values. As a consequence, the correlation of the two tests was low (kappa < 0.7). During analysis of the possible contributing factors of this poor performance, we have excluded low tumor percentage of the samples, but identified dMMR phenotypes (classic versus non-classic or unusual) as possible contributors. CONCLUSION: Although our cohort did not include samples with identified technical errors, our data strongly support previous reports that unidentified preanalytical factors might have the major influence on the poor performance of the MSI PCR and MMR IHC. Furthermore, the case is open whether the two test types are equally powerful predictive markers of immunotherapies.

CHEK2 germline variants identified in familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer lead to impaired protein structure and function.

Approximately 5 to 15% of nonmedullary thyroid cancers (NMTC) present in a familial form (familial nonmedullary thyroid cancers [FNMTC]). The genetic basis of FNMTC remains largely unknown, representing a limitation for diagnostic and clinical management. Recently, germline mutations in DNA repair-related genes have been described in cases with thyroid cancer (TC), suggesting a role in FNMTC etiology. Here, two FNMTC families were studied, each with two members affected with TC. Ninety-four hereditary cancer predisposition genes were analyzed through next-generation sequencing, revealing two germline CHEK2 missense variants (c.962A > C, p.E321A and c.470T > C, p.I157T), which segregated with TC in each FNMTC family. p.E321A, located in the CHK2 protein kinase domain, is a rare variant, previously unreported in the literature. Conversely, p.I157T, located in CHK2 forkhead-associated domain, has been extensively described, having conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity. CHK2 proteins (WT and variants) were characterized using biophysical methods, molecular dynamics simulations, and immunohistochemistry. Overall, biophysical characterization of these CHK2 variants showed that they have compromised structural and conformational stability and impaired kinase activity, compared to the WT protein. CHK2 appears to aggregate into amyloid-like fibrils in vitro, which opens future perspectives toward positioning CHK2 in cancer pathophysiology. CHK2 variants exhibited higher propensity for this conformational change, also displaying higher expression in thyroid tumors. The present findings support the utility of complementary biophysical and in silico approaches toward understanding the impact of genetic variants in protein structure and function, improving the current knowledge on CHEK2 variants' role in FNMTC genetic basis, with prospective clinical translation.

Characterization of a germline variant TNS1 c.2999-1G > C in a hereditary cancer syndrome family.

Hereditary cancer syndromes result from the presence of inherited pathogenic variants within susceptibility genes. However, the susceptibility genes associated with hereditary cancer syndrome remain predominantly unidentified. Here, we reported a case of hereditary cancer syndrome observed in a Chinese family harboring a germline mutation in Tensin1 (TNS1). We described a 59-year-old female patient presented with Multiple myeloma and Thyroid carcinoma. The proband and her family members exhibited suspected tumor syndrome due to occurrences of other cancer cases. After oncogenetic counseling, whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing were conducted and a primary driver mutation of TNS1 (NM_022648.7:c.2999-1G > C) was detected. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis revealed that TNS1 was expressed lower in different tumors when compared to normal, including Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Breast invasive carcinoma, Thyroid carcinoma andColon adenocarcinoma cells. Despite the well-established role of TNS1 as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer and colorectal cancer, its potential utility as a marker gene for diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer remains uncertain. Here, our data demonstrated that knockdown of TNS1 could promote cell proliferation and migration in Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells. In addition, TNS1 regulated migration through EMT signaling pathway in PDAC cells. Our findings proposed that this variant was likely involved in cancer predisposition by disrupting the normal splicing process. In summary, we presented a genetic disease by linking an intronic mutation inTNS1. We aim to provide early detection of cancers by identifying germline variants in susceptibility genes.

Hereditary Renal Cancer Syndromes.

Familial kidney tumors represent a rare variety of hereditary cancer syndromes, although systematic gene sequencing studies revealed that as many as 5% of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are associated with germline pathogenic variants (PVs). Most instances of RCC predisposition are attributed to the loss-of-function mutations in tumor suppressor genes, which drive the malignant progression via somatic inactivation of the remaining allele. These syndromes almost always have extrarenal manifestations, for example, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, fumarate hydratase tumor predisposition syndrome (FHTPS), Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome, tuberous sclerosis (TS), etc. In contrast to the above conditions, hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma syndrome (HPRCC) is caused by activating mutations in the MET oncogene and affects only the kidneys. Recent years have been characterized by remarkable progress in the development of targeted therapies for hereditary RCCs. The HIF2aplha inhibitor belzutifan demonstrated high clinical efficacy towards VHL-associated RCCs. mTOR downregulation provides significant benefits to patients with tuberous sclerosis. MET inhibitors hold promise for the treatment of HPRCC. Systematic gene sequencing studies have the potential to identify novel RCC-predisposing genes, especially when applied to yet unstudied populations.

Referral patterns and genetic testing outcomes in a contemporary hereditary renal cancer clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Multidisciplinary hereditary tumor clinics are a collaborative format to identify and treat patients with genetic cancer predispositions. The hereditary renal cancer clinic at Indiana University is comprised of a urologic oncologist, medical oncologist, clinical geneticist, and genetic counselor. The clinic holds regular tumor board meetings, where patient histories, pedigrees, imaging, pathology, and management plans are collectively reviewed and discussed. Here we report the contemporary experience for our hereditary renal cancer clinic, with description and analysis of referral patterns, patient profiles, and genetic testing outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of an IRB-approved, prospectively maintained database of patients seen in the hereditary renal cancer clinic was performed. Patient characteristics, genetic testing results, and disease characteristics were reported and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients seen in clinics from January 2018 to June 2023 were included. Patient's median age was between 40 and 49 years old, and 88.7% were Caucasian. The most common reasons for referral were early-onset renal tumors (40%), known hereditary renal cancer syndrome (29%), and hereditary renal cancer syndrome screening (13%). Of those with a tissue diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma, 46.2% were clear cell subtype. The presence of nonrenal syndromic features concerning for hereditary renal tumor syndrome was predictive of pathogenic mutation identification (OR 13.45, P < 0.0001). Patient race and presence of multifocal tumors were not predictive of pathogenic mutation identification. When restricting analysis to patients with an established renal malignancy, high-grade tumor histology was predictive of a pathogenic mutation (OR 8.17, P = 0.012), though higher pathologic stage and nonclear cell histology were not. Referral for early-onset renal tumor (age < 45 years) predicted lower likelihood of pathogenic mutations (OR 0.10, P = 0.0002). FH gene mutations were the most commonly identified pathogenic mutations. Genetic testing of family members (cascade testing) was recommended to 9 patients seen in clinic; a pathogenic mutation was subsequently identified in all but one of these families. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are useful for referring physicians and patients in determining patient referral to hereditary cancer clinics, and for counseling patients undergoing genetic testing. Data from non-Caucasian patients and evolving implications of variants of unclear significance (VUS) may represent future research directions for hereditary renal cancer clinics.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 mosaicism in patients with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency.

Differential diagnosis between constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is crucial as treatment and surveillance differ. We report the case of a girl with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic NF1 who developed a glioblastoma. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins identified PMS2 loss in tumour and normal cells and WES showed the tumour had an ultra-hypermutated phenotype, supporting the diagnosis of CMMRD. Germline analyses identified two variants (one pathogenic variant and one classified as variant(s) of unknown significance) in the PMS2 gene and subsequent functional assays on blood lymphocytes confirmed the diagnosis of CMMRD. The large plexiform neurofibroma of the thigh and the freckling were however more compatible with NF1. Indeed, a NF1 PV (variant allele frequencies of 20%, 3% and 9% and in blood, skin and saliva samples, respectively) was identified confirming a mosaicism for NF1. Retrospective analysis of a French cohort identified NF1 mosaicism in blood DNA in 2 out of 22 patients with CMMRD, underlining the existence of early postzygotic PV of NF1 gene in patients with CMMRD whose tumours have been frequently reported to exhibit somatic NF1 mutations. It highlights the potential role of this pathway in the pathogenesis of CMMRD-associated gliomas and argues in favour of testing MEK inhibitors in this context.

Hereditary succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma.

Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), formed by four subunits SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, and an assembly factor SDHAF2, functions as a key respiratory enzyme. Biallelic inactivation of genes encoding any of the components, almost always in the presence of a germline mutation, causes loss of function of the entire enzyme complex (so-called SDH deficiency) and subsequent development of SDH-deficient neoplasms which include pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These tumors may occur in the same patient or kindred. SDH-deficient RCC shows distinctive morphological features with vacuolated eosinophilic cytoplasm due to distinctive cytoplasmatic inclusions containing flocculent material. The diagnosis is confirmed by loss of SDHB on immunohistochemistry with positive internal control. The majority of tumors occur in the setting of germline mutations in one of the SDH genes, most commonly SDHB. The prognosis is excellent for low-grade tumors but worse for high-grade tumors with high-grade nuclei, sarcomatoid change, or coagulative necrosis. Awareness of the morphological features and low-threshold for applying SDHB immunohistochemistry help identify patients with SDH-deficient RCC and hereditary SDH-deficient tumor syndromes. In this review we summarize recent development on the clinical and genetic features, diagnostic approach, and pitfalls of SDH-deficient syndrome, focusing on SDH-deficient renal cell carcinomas.

Newly Recognized Genetic Tumor Syndromes of the CNS in the 5th WHO Classification: Imaging Overview with Genetic Updates.

The nervous system is commonly involved in a wide range of genetic tumor-predisposition syndromes. The classification of genetic tumor syndromes has evolved during the past years; however, it has now become clear that these syndromes can be categorized into a relatively small number of major mechanisms, which form the basis of the new 5th edition of the World Health Organization book (beta online version) on genetic tumor syndromes. For the first time, the World Health Organization has also included a separate chapter on genetic tumor syndromes in the latest edition of all the multisystem tumor series, including the 5th edition of CNS tumors. Our understanding of these syndromes has evolved rapidly since the previous edition (4th edition, 2016) with recognition of 8 new syndromes, including the following: Elongator protein complex-medulloblastoma syndrome, BRCA1-associated protein 1 tumor-predisposition syndrome, DICER1 syndrome, familial paraganglioma syndrome, melanoma-astrocytoma syndrome, Carney complex, Fanconi anemia, and familial retinoblastoma. This review provides a description of these new CNS tumor syndromes with a focus on imaging and genetic characteristics.

Glioma arising in the setting of mismatch repair deficiency-rare or are we missing it?

Germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) can be mono-allelic or biallelic, resulting in a Lynch syndrome (LS) or constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome respectively. Glioma arising in the setting of MMR deficiency is uncommon. We describe two pediatric patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) and associated MMR protein deficiency. On histomorphology both cases showed HGG with astrocytic morphology and prominent multinucleated tumor cells. On immunohistochemistry, the first case was negative for IDH1 p.R132H showed loss of ATRX and p53 positivity. The second case was positive for IDH1 p.R132H and p53, but showed retained expression of ATRX. The histomorphology in both cases and additionally IDH mutation with retained ATRX in the second case, prompted us to test for MMR protein deficiency which was carried out by immunohistochemistry (IHC). One case revealed an immunostaining pattern suggestive of CMMRD while the other was suggestive of LS. Both the cases showed good response to surgery and radio-chemotherapy in the follow-up available. Our cases highlight the importance of testing for MMR proteins by simple IHC, in the setting of appropriate clinical scenario, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings. The recognition of these tumors is extremely important to guide further treatment and prompt family screening.

Kidney cancer: Links between hereditary syndromes and sporadic tumorigenesis.

Multiple hereditary syndromes predispose to kidney cancer, including Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, BAP1-Tumor Predisposition Syndrome, Hereditary Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma, Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, Hereditary Paraganglioma-Pheochromocytoma Syndrome, Fumarate Hydratase Tumor Predisposition Syndrome, and Cowden syndrome. In some cases, mutations in the genes that cause hereditary kidney cancer are tightly linked to similar histologic features in sporadic RCC. For example, clear cell RCC occurs in the hereditary syndrome VHL, and sporadic ccRCC usually has inactivation of the VHL gene. In contrast, mutations in FLCN, the causative gene for Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, are rarely found in sporadic RCC. Here, we focus on the genes and pathways that link hereditary and sporadic RCC.

The c.386A>C p.(Asn129Thr) variant in SMAD4 is likely to be pathogenic, causing Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome. A case report of a mosaic variant.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary disorder characterized by the development of multiple hamartomatous gastrointestinal polyps. Here, we present a case of JPS with a mosaic variant in SMAD4. METHODS: Exome sequencing TRIO analysis, using germline DNA from the biological mother and father along with the index case (IC). RESULTS: A 46-year-old male with no family history of cancer presented with chronic iron deficiency anemia and was diagnosed with massive gastric polyposis (≥100 polyps). At the age of 59, he underwent a total gastrectomy, revealing numerous polyps occupying the entire gastric mucosa, including a 5 cm gastric hyperplastic polyp with high-grade dysplasia and focal adenocarcinoma. TRIO analysis identified the c.386A>C p.(Asn129Thr) variant in the SMAD4 gene at an allele frequency (AF) of 22%, suggesting its mosaic origin. Subsequently, the variant was found in heterozygosity in the IC's son, who exhibited two subcentimeter polyps in the colon and seven inflammatory gastric polyps with gastric inflammatory areas and hyperplasia, suggesting that the c.386A>C p.(Asn129Thr) variant in SMAD4 segregated with the phenotype. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence supporting the classification of the c.386A>C p.(Asn129Thr) variant in SMAD4 as a likely pathogenic variant. This finding contributes to improved accuracy in the diagnosis and genetic counseling of JPS.

Secondary (additional) findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: Disease manifestation, health care outcomes, and costs of disclosure.

PURPOSE: The UK 100,000 Genomes Project offered participants screening for additional findings (AFs) in genes associated with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or hereditary cancer syndromes including breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch, familial adenomatous polyposis, MYH-associated polyposis, multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN), and von Hippel-Lindau. Here, we report disclosure processes, manifestation of AF-related disease, outcomes, and costs. METHODS: An observational study in an area representing one-fifth of England. RESULTS: Data were collected from 89 adult AF recipients. At disclosure, among 57 recipients of a cancer-predisposition-associated AF and 32 recipients of an FH-associated AF, 35% and 88%, respectively, had personal and/or family history evidence of AF-related disease. During post-disclosure investigations, 4 cancer-AF recipients had evidence of disease, including 1 medullary thyroid cancer. Six women with an HBOC AF, 3 women with a Lynch syndrome AF, and 2 individuals with a MEN AF elected for risk-reducing surgery. New hyperlipidemia diagnoses were made in 6 FH-AF recipients and treatment (re-)initiated for 7 with prior hyperlipidemia. Generating and disclosing AFs in this region cost £1.4m; £8680 per clinically significant AF. CONCLUSION: Generation and disclosure of AFs identifies individuals with and without personal or familial evidence of disease and prompts appropriate clinical interventions. Results can inform policy toward secondary findings.

Hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma (HPRCC) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by the occurrence of bilateral and multifocal, classic type papillary renal cell carcinomas. In the recent decades, extensive molecular studies have narrowed the molecular underpinnings of this syndrome to missense mutations in tyrosine kinase domain of MET proto-oncogene. Although MET mutations are specific to HPRCC, it has been found in sporadic papillary renal cell carcinomas and as recently reported, in biphasic squamoid alveolar variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Dual MET/VEGFR2 kinase inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown promising results in systemic therapy for HPRCC.

Classification of germline variants identified in cancer predisposition genetic testing - consensus of the CZECANCA consortium.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary cancer syndromes are an important subset of malignant cancers caused by pathogenic variants in one of many known cancer predisposition genes. Diagnosis of cancer predisposition is based on genetic testing using next-generation sequencing. This allows many genes to be analysed at once, increasing the number of variants identified. The correct classification of the variants found is essential for the clinical interpretation of genetic test results. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to summarise the rules for classifying identified variants within individual laboratories and to present the process for creating a common classification. In the Czech Republic, the sharing of identified genetic variants and the development of their consensus classification among national laboratory diagnostic communities is carried out within the Czech Cancer Panel for Clinical Application (CZECANCA) consortium of scientific and diagnostic oncogenetic laboratories. Consensus for variant classification follows a defined protocol. Sharing the results and consensus classification accelerates and refines the release of genetic test results, harmonises results between laboratories and thus contributes to improving the care of individuals at high risk of cancer and their relatives.

Preventive strategies in familial and hereditary colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. While most cases are sporadic, a significant proportion of cases are associated with familial and hereditary syndromes. Individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer have an increased risk of developing the disease, and those with hereditary syndromes such as Lynch syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis have a significantly higher risk. In these populations, preventive strategies are critical for reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. This review provides an overview of current preventive strategies for individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer due to familial or hereditary factors. The manuscript includes a discussion of risk assessment and genetic testing, highlighting the importance of identifying at-risk individuals and families. This review describes various preventive measures, including surveillance colonoscopy, chemoprevention, and prophylactic surgery, and their respective benefits and limitations. Together, this work highlights the importance of preventive strategies in familial and hereditary colorectal cancer.